So initial reports said the bombs were crude, then on Saturday officials changed their mind and said they were military-grade. But today they are saying they were made in a Leeds kitchen sink. So which is it?

This is in response to Armando's comment in this diary about the double standard being applied to different theories about Bush's level of complicity in the London bombings.

Hi Armando

I'm glad you pointed this obvious double standard! So lemme see if I got it right here...

If a news story with evidence appears outside the mainstream media suggesting that Bush and his puppetmasters deliberately engineered the London bombings for political gain, then it is a wild conspiracy theory worthy only of vigorous ridicule and possible banning.

But if a news story with evidence appears inside the mainstream media suggesting that Bush and his puppetmasters unwittingly assisted the London bombers for political gain, then it is widely hailed as the most important revelation of the year and is immediately front-paged.

Is that about right?